Unsubscribe

Confirm you would like to unsubscribe from this list

Remove strategy

Confirm you would like to remove this strategy from your list

Welcome to Thornburg

Please select your location and role to help personalize the site.
Please review our Terms & Conditions

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE

Please read the information below. By accessing this web site of Thornburg Investment Management, Inc. ("Thornburg" or "we"), you acknowledge that you understand and accept the following terms and conditions of use.

Disclaimers

Products or services mentioned on this site are subject to legal and regulatory requirements in applicable jurisdictions and may not be licensed or available in all jurisdictions and there may be restrictions or limitations to whom this information may be made available. Unless otherwise indicated, no regulator or government authority has reviewed the information or the merits of the products and services referenced herein. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Investments carry risks, including possible loss of principal.

Reference to a fund or security anywhere on this website is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that or any other security. The information is not a complete analysis of every material fact concerning any market, industry, or investment, nor is it intended to predict the performance of any investment or market.

All opinions and estimates included on this website constitute judgements of Thornburg as at the date of this website and are subject to change without notice.

All information and contents of this website are furnished "as is." Data has been obtained from sources considered reliable, but Thornburg makes no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of such information and has no obligation to provide updates or changes. Thornburg disclaims, to the fullest extent of the law, any implied or express warranty of any kind, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and non-infringement.

If you live in a state that does not allow disclaimers of implied warranties, our disclaimer may not apply to you.

Although Thornburg intends the information contained in this website to be accurate and reliable, errors sometimes occur. Thornburg does not warrant that the information to be free of errors, that the functions contained in the site will be uninterrupted, that defects will be corrected or that the site and servers are free from viruses or other harmful components. You agree that you are responsible for the means you use to access this website and understand that your hardware, software, the Internet, your Internet service provider, and other third parties involved in connecting you to our website may not perform as intended or desired. We also disclaim responsibility for damages third parties may cause to you through the use of this website, whether intentional or unintentional. For example, you understand that hackers could breach our security procedures, and that we will not be responsible for any related damages.

Thornburg Investment Management, Inc. is regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange under U.S. laws which may differ materially from laws in other jurisdictions.

Online Privacy and Cookie Policy

Please review our Online Privacy and Cookie Policy, which is hereby incorporated by reference as part of these terms and conditions.

Third Party Content

Certain website's content has been obtained from sources that Thornburg believes to be reliable as of the date presented but Thornburg cannot guarantee the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, or suitability for use of such content. The content does not take into account individual investor's circumstances, objectives or needs. The content is not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument or any investment management services, nor does it constitute investment advice and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision.

Suitability

No determination has been made regarding the suitability of any securities, financial instruments or strategies for any investor. The website's content is provided on the basis and subject to the explanations, caveats and warnings set out in this notice and elsewhere herein. The website's content does not purport to provide any legal, tax or accounting advice. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe Thornburg's efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk.

Limited License and Restrictions on Use

Except as otherwise stated in these terms of use or as expressly authorized by Thornburg in writing, you may not:

  • Modify, copy, distribute, transmit, post, display, perform, reproduce, publish, broadcast, license, create derivative works from, transfer, sell, or exploit any reports, data, information, content, software, RSS and podcast feeds, products, services, or other materials (collectively, "Materials") on, generated by or obtained from this website, whether through links or otherwise;
  • Redeliver any page, text, image or Materials on this website using "framing" or other technology;
  • Engage in any conduct that could damage, disable, or overburden (i) this website, (ii) any Materials or services provided through this website, or (iii) any systems, networks, servers, or accounts related to this website, including without limitation, using devices or software that provide repeated automated access to this website, other than those made generally available by Thornburg;
  • Probe, scan, or test the vulnerability of any Materials, services, systems, networks, servers, or accounts related to this website or attempt to gain unauthorized access to Materials, services, systems, networks, servers, or accounts connected or associated with this website through hacking, password or data mining, or any other means of circumventing any access-limiting, user authentication or security device of any Materials, services, systems, networks, servers, or accounts related to this website; or
  • Modify, copy, obscure, remove or display the Thornburg name, logo, trademarks, notices or images without Thornburg's express written permission. To obtain such permission, you may e-mail us at info@thornburg.com.

Severability, Governing Law

Failure by Thornburg to enforce any provision(s) of these terms and conditions shall not be construed as a waiver of any provision or right. This website is controlled and operated by Thornburg from its offices in Santa Fe, New Mexico. The laws of the State of New Mexico govern these terms and conditions. If you take legal action relating to these terms and conditions, you agree to file such action only in state or federal court in New Mexico and you consent and submit to the personal jurisdiction of those courts for the purposes of litigating any such action.

Termination

You acknowledge and agree that Thornburg may restrict, suspend or terminate these terms and conditions or your access to, and use, of the all or any part this website, including any links to third-party sites, at any time, with or without cause, including but not limited to any breach of these terms and conditions, in Thornburg's absolute discretion and without prior notice or liability.

Decline

Give Us a Call

Fund Operations
800.847.0200

FIND ANOTHER CONTACT
ESG

Is the World Gaslighting ESG?

Jake Walko
Director of ESG Investing & Global Investment Stewardship
27 Oct 2022
8 min read

ESG finds itself at the center of a debate around fiduciary responsibility. What’s lost in the noise? Jake Walko, Director of ESG Investing at Thornburg, explains.

There is something of a rite of passage for new employees arriving at Thornburg – a discussion about cars. Not about whose is nicest or most-beat-up but rather about all-wheel-drive and four-wheel-drive. Santa Fe, despite external perceptions to the contrary, is at the foothills of the Rocky Mountains. At an elevation of 7200 feet, the city experiences beautiful weather punctuated by vicious summer cloud bursts and significant winter snow.

Lately, however, the conversation has taken on the additional debate between internal combustion engines vs. electric vehicles. But the conversations have not been what you’d expect. Instead, the debate centers very closely around the very same imprecise issues that plague ESG choices within investment portfolios, but even more notably, in how funds are judged for the quality and integrity of their ESG work.

There is no question in these debates that your next car should be dual-engine or single engine hybrid – it’s still very difficult to find charging stations in rural New Mexico as well as in most remote areas. Similarly for our portfolio choices we don’t doubt that the securities we’ll be interested in choosing over the coming years must be more overtly sustainable. But the interim is what matters, and at this moment in time the single engine EV might be the wrong choice.

Criticism of ESG Investing is on the Rise and May be Impacting Flows

ESG touches a lot of nerves in both positive and negative ways. In recent weeks and months ESG investing has come under increasing criticism as the wrong choice for investors and the economy in aggregate. ESG investing has been accused of misdirecting capital: distracting investors and company management from pursuing their goals of maximizing long-term returns and profitability through innovation and efficiency. Instead, investors and management are told to meet amorphous environmental, social and governance goals that to some appear to support a political agenda. Such critics point to the myriad of ESG measuring tools and criteria, which is especially problematic for institutional investors and advisors who have a fiduciary responsibility to their clients to maximize returns and minimize risk. However, for individual investors, as long as ESG goals align with their own values, ESG-focused investing may be a welcome opportunity.

Some Criticism is Valid, Some Ignores the Time Dimension

At Thornburg Investment Management, we think both sides of the intensifying debate are on solid ground when it comes to fiduciary responsibility and ESG issues. But what is most often lost in the conversation is the time-dimension of the problem. We agree that the need for an energy transition is urgent but quantifying its cost, value, and efficacy is exactly what capital markets are being asked to solve. Going back to our conversations around the water cooler, the answer can’t be as simple as to buy an EV today – it has to consider the state of your current vehicle, its costs, its useful life, interest rates, gas prices, electricity prices, and many other factors. To cut to the chase – the sunk cost of your existing vehicle might make maintaining it in lieu of a new purchase a much better value. In sustainability terms the emissions from building your existing asset are already out there, and while that doesn’t make them good, it does make them better than the yet-unrealized emissions embodied in the production of your new vehicle.

Let’s dig deeper into this issue of production, operation, and embodied carbon. We see, for example, that EV production is highly polluting and environmentally destructive, in many cases even considerably more so than a new Internal Combustion Engine vehicle. This is largely due to the battery pack, whose origin itself is subject to a myriad of sustainability challenges – from the nature of materials extraction (think Cobalt in the Democratic Republic of the Congo) to chemical processing and its energy intensity (think about the energy required to process copper ore, which is less than 1% copper). The sustainable argument is that this EV makes up for this problem by emitting nothing from operations – but, and we don’t need to explore that here, that’s heavily dependent on where you live, where you charge, and what the power generation mix is. Even in California nearly two-thirds of its electric power generation comes from non-renewables, and it’s higher than that when its sclerotic grid is under pressure.

This is not an argument against buying an EV – this is a point that the objective of sustainable investing has to be extracting the most value from existing resources at the lowest allowable cost to society and the environment. This is an argument for getting more out of our existing assets before we make the jump to the next, better, one. Whether it’s EVs or companies the equation doesn’t change – retiring assets prematurely, either because they have life left in them or because there exists a demand for their service somewhere else, is counter to a sustainable reality we need to accept.

If You Expect Purity, You may Wind Up Empty-Handed

What sparks this argument – and the division between pursuing fiduciary responsibilities vs individual objectives – is the unfair dichotomy that is put forward by advocates of the type of sustainable investing where we all chase purity – moral but better-than-you. This pursuit makes us think that there are either good or bad companies, good or bad portfolios, and nothing in between. But more often than not this investigation leads us to find that the truly ‘green’ portfolios still contain companies that use the ‘bad’ companies’ power, components, transportation, services, etc. If you invest in a company that supports this transition through its fuel or materials over time, you’re immediately accused of greenwashing. In other words, only a political advocate of ESG can authentically pronounce that this is not a good business and absolutely does not belong in an ESG portfolio.

I often find myself at ESG conferences, where after arriving on fleets of Boeings and Airbuses, aviation and aerospace & defense industries are condemned. While sitting in a beautiful, LEED-x building, and eating a “sustainable” lunch, materials companies and agricultural companies are described as polluting industries. Or I see climate change conferences held in exotic locations, with attendees arriving on private jets and yachts as opposed to holding the same conference virtually. The nuance that we must pick better products and companies is not lost, but neither is the hypocrisy of judging investments and portfolios by their exposure to an entire sector of an economy, without which our modern lives would be wholly impossible.

All of our clients hire us to manage their money to the best risk-return profile we can. These clients count on us for deep research, sophistication of approach, extensive deliberation, and decision making grounded in collective expertise and collaboration. Too often portfolios, mostly built for specific personal finance objectives, are judged based on time horizons they are not built for. Or they are judged by a controversial security held in the portfolio, even though the tumult might not have been commensurate to the size of the company’s activities or even due to their product or resided in the distant past. An entire industry of professionals exists to explicitly understand and separate the needs of retirees from college-bound students, of those with high-risk appetites from those investing for only limited time periods, among an endless number of examples. Just as investors must be matched to their appropriate investment vehicles, so too ESG analysis must be appropriate for those strategies and their specific objectives and time horizons.  Using methods that don’t take this into account to judge capital market activity is its own kind of fallacy and hardly the objective of sustainable investing.

“Less ESG” Companies Offer Opportunities to meet Fiduciary Responsibilities

We don’t have all the answers regarding the quality of each company’s contribution to every aspect of ESG. However, we do think that there are overlooked businesses whose absolute dollar capital expenditures into the energy transition area far eclipse those of companies with a more ostentatious place in the sustainability landscape. Put differently, we think a core competency of investment management is judging whose spending on a topic is best placed, of best quality, and of best efficiency to win revenues and profits. Similar to the EV example we think it would be an error to assume that the traditional, ‘less ESG’ companies currently operating in any sector of the economy, with their years of operational expertise, wealth of human and intellectual property, and place in the market – not to mention the billions of R&D and Capex dollars spent on new, sustainable future – are somehow at a disadvantage in the race to be the providers of the future.

How one measures all this and how to quantify the progress and success of these diverse businesses remains a challenge that active managers are uniquely equipped to handle. Through an investigation of the research around ESG Momentum, and by embracing deep research, rather than through a strictly siloed approach to picking winners and losers on an up or down basis, we believe we can build portfolios of assets that deliver on current objectives while compounding future value from a prudent deployment of internal capital. These companies might be boring, misunderstood, or unusual in that the connotation of their business and its connection to sustainability is not immediately self-evident in an ESG zealot’s public psyche. Yet they are the investments we are using all our expertise to thoughtfully allocate our clients’ capital to.

The many global crises that ESG is looked to, at least partially, address is no-doubt urgent, but so is the need to pursue the investment goals of our clients. And so is the need to pursue the fiduciary responsibilities of an institution and advisor, i.e., of the charge of a firm to innovate methods of analysis so that finite resources can be best allocated to the most worthwhile ends. Additionally, we as a society, both citizens and corporations, need to appreciate and maximize existing assets and deploy the profits of this embodied carbon and sunk costs into the best projects, regardless of whether those projects exist within the walls of a ‘good’ or ‘bad’ company. These challenges are complex and demand sophisticated, diverse, and multi-tracked solutions. In the old adage of ‘no monopoly on good ideas’ we think all companies should contribute and not one, but many will ultimately offer the solutions we need on sustainability, combined with the best returns for investors.

Discover more about:

Stay Connected

Subscribe now to stay up-to-date with Thornburg’s news and insights.
Subscribe

More Insights

Fixed Income

The Changing Tides within Fixed Income Liquidity

Portfolio Manager & Managing Director Christian Hoffmann discusses the factors impacting liquidity in the fixed income markets and the squeeze we see today.
Advising Clients

When it Comes to Investing, It’s Not Over Until the Full-Bodied Lady Sings

Finally, the answer to the often-asked question, "How is Investing Like Opera?"
Advising Clients

The Power of “May I Ask You?”

Jan and Hollis share ideas on how to talk to a client, family member or friend who's experienced a heart-breaking life-event.

Our insights. Your inbox.

Sign up to receive timely market commentary and perspectives from our financial experts delivered to your inbox weekly.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Feedback